When you are trying to sort out your own low cost health insurance, self pay can be a bit of a minefield. So here is a quick guide on what to look for and what means what!
What we're talking about exactly here is managed care. The name managed care covers both preferred provider organization (PPO) and health maintenance organizations plans (HMO). These options have developed over time in an attempt to keep your insurance premiums affordable.
But in order to do that the plans have to place a few limits on the level of health care provided. So long as you can live with these limits and reductions in care, a PPO or an HMO may well offer you great value.
Let's have a quick run through what each one is.
HMOs
They are cheaper than the PPO. These normally need you to you use their doctors network or, if you can't or won', they'll ask you to pay some increased rates. Once you've agreed the basic method of operation, you nominate a primary care physician who will be your main point of contact and make the majority of your health and treatment decisions. If you need medical work done outside the network then they will supply the various references and recommendations to ensure you receive the necessary cover.
PPOs
The preferred provider organization plan gives you the chance to actually choose from a network of doctors. As in the HMO you'd also pick a doctor who would be your first point of contact, your main contact.
Basically, the main differences between a PPO and an HMO is one of choice. The HMO would pay the physicians of it's network a "capitation fee" - meaning that they get paid a set sum per member of the HMO on their register. What services, treatments etc that patient needs is immaterial, they are billed as a lump sum fee which is agreed up front. One draw back to this method is that it pays the doc to keep your visits to minimum. The less they see of you, the more of your flat fee value becomes pure profit to them. In a PPO arrangement the doctor actually gets paid for each visit. If you're looking more for a traditional variation of care, then the PPO is the one to chose.
Another potential limitation of the HMO is that they sometimes offer their medical care services via a sub-network of doctors etc. The restriction of this method is that you are effectively tied down to those resources of that network or group. This could be a problem for some people which is why it is now required for all HMOs to notify all of their "clients", offering you the opportunity to make your cover unique, by signing up for Point of Service plan. The PoS lets you use resources which are outside of the network and take out or put in as you need. For those looking for the low cost, self help option, the HMOs are a good choice.
Source: EzineArticles.com/?expert=Duncan_Roberts
What we're talking about exactly here is managed care. The name managed care covers both preferred provider organization (PPO) and health maintenance organizations plans (HMO). These options have developed over time in an attempt to keep your insurance premiums affordable.
But in order to do that the plans have to place a few limits on the level of health care provided. So long as you can live with these limits and reductions in care, a PPO or an HMO may well offer you great value.
Let's have a quick run through what each one is.
HMOs
They are cheaper than the PPO. These normally need you to you use their doctors network or, if you can't or won', they'll ask you to pay some increased rates. Once you've agreed the basic method of operation, you nominate a primary care physician who will be your main point of contact and make the majority of your health and treatment decisions. If you need medical work done outside the network then they will supply the various references and recommendations to ensure you receive the necessary cover.
PPOs
The preferred provider organization plan gives you the chance to actually choose from a network of doctors. As in the HMO you'd also pick a doctor who would be your first point of contact, your main contact.
Basically, the main differences between a PPO and an HMO is one of choice. The HMO would pay the physicians of it's network a "capitation fee" - meaning that they get paid a set sum per member of the HMO on their register. What services, treatments etc that patient needs is immaterial, they are billed as a lump sum fee which is agreed up front. One draw back to this method is that it pays the doc to keep your visits to minimum. The less they see of you, the more of your flat fee value becomes pure profit to them. In a PPO arrangement the doctor actually gets paid for each visit. If you're looking more for a traditional variation of care, then the PPO is the one to chose.
Another potential limitation of the HMO is that they sometimes offer their medical care services via a sub-network of doctors etc. The restriction of this method is that you are effectively tied down to those resources of that network or group. This could be a problem for some people which is why it is now required for all HMOs to notify all of their "clients", offering you the opportunity to make your cover unique, by signing up for Point of Service plan. The PoS lets you use resources which are outside of the network and take out or put in as you need. For those looking for the low cost, self help option, the HMOs are a good choice.
Source: EzineArticles.com/?expert=Duncan_Roberts
No comments:
Post a Comment